数码天地今日: 0|主题: 4756|排名: 51

1. 转载技术文章请表明出处; 2. 鼓励原创性技术文章; 3. 拒绝水帖, 广告帖和人身攻击帖

推荐主题

新窗全部主题最新热门热帖精华更多 \| 显示置顶		作者	回复/查看	最后发表

公告: FreeOZ中国版域名： https://hioz.im	ubuntuhk 11-6-2010

[性能评测] 有谁比较过TPG和iTalkBB吗？最后发表： chen_edward 回复内容：家里用TPG很久。最近一邻居从TPG换成iTalkBB。据说价钱差不多，网速快很多，没有流量限制，更好的是国内带来的机顶盒，原来很多节目看不了，现在可以看了。所以有点想换。这里还有没有比较过的让我参考参考？快速回复	chen_edward 20-11-2013	02289	chen_edward 20-11-2013 12:05
[性能评测] 我的电脑启动很快啊！最后发表： woshiwopa 回复内容：好像比国内贵。。。快速回复	zgy 17-9-2011	153415	woshiwopa 25-10-2011 14:38
[性能评测] 算是見識到了RAID_0的威力 ---- 最后发表： dragonballz 回复内容：原帖由 NEWGAY 于 12-5-2011 11:55 发表登录/注册后可看大图 6870是入门及的，还是要偷偷攒钱弄个crossfire 实在是不想折腾，crossfire据说问题很多，不如直接6970了。另外，6970的话，i5又不行了，得换i7；i7上了把，得raid0 SSD。实在是没有止境。不如i5＋6870＋SSD将就过得去。快速回复	西澳海豚 24-4-2011	253917	dragonballz 13-5-2011 22:05
[性能评测] 大家都把网速贴一下最后发表： kevin2007 回复内容：原帖由 sparkzhu 于 16-12-2010 21:38 发表登录/注册后可看大图用你的网址测试了一下，和SPEEDTEST差不多 153604 3M这个太小了，用15M这个测会精确一些。还过你这个速度的确是够快的了，上传是多少呢? [ 本帖最后由 kevin2007 于 18-12-2010 00:32 编辑 ] 快速回复 ...2	sparkzhu 10-12-2010	506668	kevin2007 17-12-2010 23:30
[性能评测] 微软Windows Phone 7手机已售出4万部最后发表： conty 回复内容：这种小白鼠还是等等再当吧。我对MS的新东西表示怀疑。特别还是在他一贯不擅长的领域...... 等WP7.5差不多快速回复	EnsignKim 10-11-2010	42133	conty 11-11-2010 18:05
[性能评测] 我的星际2专用电脑到了！：）最后发表： kane321 回复内容：其实你应该搞个有线的鼠标键盘,不然玩游戏不爽快速回复	一村 9-9-2010	143166	kane321 15-9-2010 22:51
[性能评测] 哪位高手说说买路由器的注意事项？最后发表： dreamoz 回复内容：只是据说billion 7401 voip有较大杂音。是不是不考虑 voip功能的话，选pennytel 公司的ata设备插到wan口上就可以接电话机用电话？对于IPTV，是否也无需过多关注，国内下载网络电视，pplive等就能看网络电视？敬请大家讨论。快速回复	dreamoz 14-8-2010	22917	dreamoz 14-8-2010 19:40
[性能评测] 请教DLINK的604T和2624B哪个好? 最后发表： 8戒回复内容： DLINK的产品很垃圾，还不如国产的TPLINK。快速回复	shawn 7-8-2010	12100	8戒 7-8-2010 21:36
[性能评测] 本本热水洗澡记（07/07更新完毕）最后发表： sprint_root 回复内容： Contact Clearner + 吹风机快速回复	formatc 6-7-2010	62220	sprint_root 7-7-2010 18:53
[性能评测] Hanvon BC10 最后发表：四香油饼回复内容：俺觉得淘宝上有的ebay上也很快会有，果不其然，看这个： http://cgi.ebay.com.au/10-2-Sing ... hash=item3caca1abe4 价格折成rmb3000多一点。不过厚度比汉王的要厚一些快速回复	KCE 20-6-2010	32610	四香油饼 21-6-2010 14:41
[性能评测] 有人用SSD硬盘嘛？最后发表： ingeer 回复内容：還是太貴啦。。等等吧。。數碼的東西降價很快的快速回复	Fernando 27-3-2010	162141	ingeer 31-3-2010 07:14
[性能评测] Skype PC to PC视频通话时长问题最后发表： half 回复内容：目前为止，只遇到一次。感觉Skype的效果比较好就没怎么用其他的。快速回复	half 6-11-2009	22161	half 9-11-2009 20:24
[性能评测] 刚亲自测试了，金士顿 DDR2 800性能超级烂，千万别买....有图有真相！最后发表： hm40419 回复内容：这款CPU默认外频是200Mhz,倍频是14， 7楼不会连这个都不知道吧？快速回复 ...2	hm40419 22-9-2009	384886	hm40419 16-10-2009 10:54
[性能评测] 你现在用的显示器尺寸调查统计最后发表： caijiong 回复内容：买过一个24寸的,但是觉得字太小了,看着累,于是卖了,288买的,220卖的快速回复	xblues 21-10-2008	192948	caijiong 14-10-2009 10:12
[性能评测] 晒一晒我的新内存和评分，还有TT“奶罩”散热风扇！有图有真相！最后发表：小名回复内容：原帖由 key 于 10-10-2009 09:08 发表登录/注册后可看大图理论上是有可能的。我们说室温的时候是假设空气对流充分，使整个室内温度达到一个稳定值，处处同温。但事实上室内空气的对流能力有限，如果楼主住的地方又存在楼层或墙壁隔热问题，室内温度就不是稳定的了 ... 显然LZ要说明他的散热器非常的牛。。。可以让CPU的温度比室温还低。根本就不是你说的这回事。你说的是室温不均匀而已。其实，无论采用风冷和水冷，它们的最终目的也就是让发热元件能够达到室温的水平而已。如果要低于室温，必须要有压缩机/半导体智能/挥发性液体等媒介的介入。另外和LZ说说CPU的温度传感器。它是集成在晶片上的。假设它很准确，但其实它也是测量到晶片的温度而已。而CPU从发热源到散热面还有一点距离的。故结温肯定会大于表面温度。测量软件显示出来的温度，只是通过算法转换了给你看而已，并非真正的CPU表面温度。1-2度的误差就别太当真了。快速回复	hm40419 8-10-2009	162430	小名 13-10-2009 18:58
[性能评测] 秀一秀我的牛X硬盘，看谁不服的！--HDtune不准，大家别信！最后发表： hm40419 回复内容：自己看吧，服了吗？ HDtune太假了，一点不准。快速回复	hm40419 12-10-2009	01896	hm40419 12-10-2009 00:12
[性能评测] 大家进来讨论下细节希捷 500GB 和 1TB 硬盘的质量，谁碰到问题产品了吗？最后发表： hm40419 回复内容：希捷真不争气。西数简直是个无良小商贩，乘火打劫，使劲涨价。日立和三星基本无视。来副对联：上联：西数无良，纵横马勒戈壁！下联：希捷落魄，幽怨卧草泥马！求横批快速回复	hm40419 3-10-2009	42087	hm40419 10-10-2009 00:00
[性能评测] 谁给推荐个好的电子词典？最后发表： shaly 回复内容： casio据说不能扩展内容，国产的那个什么快易典价格便宜很多，内容也比casio多多了所以卖家似乎不怎么推荐casio 快速回复	shaly 28-9-2009	32022	shaly 28-9-2009 12:00
[性能评测] 有人在用LED屏的Thinkpad吗?谈谈感受最后发表： sparkzhu 回复内容：苹果macbook pro用的都是led,感觉轻薄，色彩亮点，其他好像没啥区别快速回复	喜悦 24-8-2009	72272	sparkzhu 6-9-2009 20:58
[性能评测] 双子座ghost系统主题 XP 最后发表： awyc 回复内容：双子座ghost系统主题 XP - 最快最新的雨林木风系统盘下载站软件授权：免费软件软件类型：雨林木风主题运行环境：Win98/NT/2000/XP/2003 软件大小：17 MB 软件语言：简体中文下载地址：http://www.51ylmf.cn/ylmfxt/731.htm (推荐) thunder://QUFmdHA6Ly9kb3duLndpbjQwMDAuY24vZGVzay8yMDI3Mi5yYXJaWg== 登录/注册后可看大图相关简介：十二星座之双子座ghost系统主题 XP版,双子座是从冬季到春季之间，出现在银河东岸的一个星座。双子座的符号表示双胞胎的兄弟，其守护星为水星，守护神为支配知识的赫尔美 ... --以上内容来自双子座ghost系统主题 XP - 最快最新的雨林木风系统盘下载站 www.51ylmf.cn 快速回复	awyc 8-7-2009	01758	awyc 8-7-2009 17:32
[性能评测] 显卡2针风扇调速器，那里有卖？----显卡风扇噪音太大了！最后发表： liwus 回复内容：原帖由 hm40419 于 19-6-2009 14:30 发表登录/注册后可看大图我试了，修改显卡BIOS后，无法刷进去。技嘉客服说，这款显卡的转速，不受BIOS控制，只要一接通电源，风扇就会满转速转起来！最后，我一恼火把显卡风扇给拆了，踩了一脚，丢垃圾桶了！然后在机箱上拆了一个风扇 ... 哈哈哈！强！快速回复	hm40419 15-6-2009	33730	liwus 19-6-2009 21:14
[性能评测] CPU 性能一览最后发表：浪沧孤客回复内容：偶的电脑的CPU是Duo T2250,没找到，估计已经淘汰了快速回复	yuba 26-5-2009	102132	浪沧孤客 2-6-2009 10:16
[性能评测] 主流大容量硬盘性能评测最后发表： xblues 回复内容：澳洲的硬件市场利润比较高，而且跟进不快，7200.12 1T都出来好久了，在澳洲还买不到。快速回复	xblues 12-5-2009	82222	xblues 12-5-2009 18:22
[性能评测] 电脑技术问题求助最后发表： kane321 回复内容： 45-80Kbps，你不会是找了一个奇慢的下载网站做的测试吧.... 要测试就找测试的网站,google下吧快速回复	robertzyz 30-3-2009	31955	kane321 30-3-2009 21:00
[性能评测] NVIDIA、AMD二十款DX10核心全总结最后发表： xblues 回复内容：这个是就硬件规格的比较，还是很有意义的。快速回复	xblues 9-2-2009	11694	xblues 9-2-2009 11:33
[性能评测] Windows Mobile Browser Battlemodo: Can You Get the Real Internet? 最后发表： xblues 回复内容： Windows Mobile Browser Battlemodo: Can You Get the Real Internet?by matt buchanan 登录/注册后可看大图 Many of you asked for a re-do of Windows Mobile browser testing after our Battlemodo declared the platform beyond worthless for surfing. So here it is, the internet running on Windows Mobile's finest hardware. Before we get started, a quick note on the last Windows Mobile test, and what we're doing differently here. Some of you guys complained that the Samsung Epix was a crappy, slow piece of hardware. However, according to Laptop, its 624MHz Marvell processor and 128MB RAM are specs that just about on par with the three phones clamored for in the comments. Still, you get your wish: Here we lined up the Sony Xperia X1, HTC Touch Pro (AT&T's Fuze) and the Samsung Omnia, and put them through the same tests. On the Epix, for Opera testing, we went with v8.65 in order to not use beta software. (Opera's own site lists 8.65 as its most recent stable version.) Here, all the Windows Mobile hardware we've added to the test have Opera 9.5 built right in. So without further explanation, here are the numbers—time to load the page, and how accurately it was rendered using Firefox 3 as a reference: 登录/注册后可看大图登录/注册后可看大图 As you can see, the Xperia, Fuze and Omnia are about on par with the Epix when it comes to IE (they suck!), though Opera Mobile 9.5 obviously crushes 8.65 when it comes to speed and competency. I asked Opera why I saw the performance differences between the three phones and they admitted that there are some tweaks, which "are mainly with making our browser work best on the different devices." So, let's look at the new phones and see how they rate against the Epix: 登录/注册后可看大图 Xperia X1 You probably noticed in the chart that load times are longer over Wi-Fi in a few spots. This is because it would randomly hang, not loading data, for up to 20 seconds. The Xperia was aggravating because its touchscreen seemed to be the least responsive of the three, making navigation a pain, though its optical mouse came in handy for zipping around pages, and it worked better than the Omnia's. One other annoyance is that Opera blocked its virtual symbol keyboard from coming up, which made it hard to enter one of the URLs. It falls smack in the middle. 登录/注册后可看大图 HTC Fuze I had the smoothest overall experience with the Fuze, and would be my closest thing to a recommendation. Its touchscreen was responsive, which made double tapping to zoom and pan around pages fast and mostly intuitive in Opera Mobile. Having symbols mapped directly to the keyboard is a big time saver while punching in URLs. This is good, since it seemed to be the slowest of the three, both over 3G and Wi-Fi. Sluggishness aside, the web experience is markedly more usable than the other two new phones. 登录/注册后可看大图 Omnia The all-touchscreen Omnia, despite being the fastest over 3G in a number of cases, was a nightmare. During the 3G tests, it managed to crash Opera on three of the six pages tested. I also had tons of Wi-Fi issues. Eventually I was told by Samsung that VZAppZone, Verizon's pseudo-app store that's all but pre-installed on the phone (after you fire it up, it installs), was breaking the Wi-Fi. (On the Epix in the previous showdown, I was later told by Samsung that installing Opera is what broke Wi-Fi for IE. So, uh, Samsung maybe...oh, whatever.) Also, its portrait keyboard has keys so ridiculously skinny, they'd remind anorexic models not to eat. When Opera did work and a page was actually loaded, it was the snappiest at moving around the page. But overall, yeesh. Conclusion So where would I slot Opera 9.5 overall if I were to slide it into the previous browser battle? I'd give it a B-. It has a great, desktop-y UI (though I wish a few of the buttons were a smidge bigger, taking into consideration fat fingers and the inadequacies of resistive touchscreens). It's really competent, and it has a solid zoom metaphor, with the double taps usually working like a charm. And it has extras like tabs. But, and this is the big but, it still doesn't feel quite as smooth or instantly responsive as Safari or Android's browser. It's clearly an OS issue, though, not an Opera one. Speaking to that, testing these three phones actually took longer than it did to test the six in the original Battlemodo, entirely because of how much wrestling I had to do with Windows Mobile. I've used close to a dozen Windows Mobile devices over the last year, and it's still a bitch. If you haven't noticed in our reviews of Windows Mobile phones, we've basically ceased comparing to them anything but other WM phones, in a wishful attempt at dulling our totally appropriate disdain for the OS, lest the review essentially turn into one giant bitchfest. They're clearly off in their own world of performance and function. Even ceding the point that Windows Mobile is somehow more functional than the iPhone or Android, it's like comparing one of those 100-in-1 kitchen gadgets that'll blend, slice, dice, toast, saute, braise, set the table, clean the dishes AND suck you off while it's doing all that to a Waring MX1000 blender. It doesn't matter how much the all-in-one gadget can technically do if you can't figure out how to use it, and it performs every task with only mediocre results. If the iPhone ran half as poorly as Windows Mobile phones, Apple haters would (rightfully) scream as loudly as Apple fanboys do about Vista. If any BlackBerry was as much of a flustercuck, reviewers would trash the crap out of it. I'm sorry, but at this point, any apologist left defending Windows Mobile is either delusional or full of crap—either way, not worth listening to. I won't touch another Windows Mobile phone until WM7 or at least 6.5, no matter how awesome the hardware looks. Call me when it runs Android. 快速回复	xblues 13-12-2008	02477	xblues 13-12-2008 00:16
[性能评测] Apple MacBook 评测 (2.0GHz, 铝壳) 最后发表： yaoyao009 回复内容：比上代小白好多了，支持新mac 快速回复	yuba 24-11-2008	62284	yaoyao009 30-11-2008 09:41
[性能评测] 硬盘怎么从250G 变成222G了最后发表：小名回复内容： 250G的硬盘格式化后有220G可用空间，非常正常。所有的硬盘都一样。至于具体的原因LZ就不用管了。只要知道这个式正常的就可以了。悄悄告诉LZ，其实google是万能的：你的几个问题都是很简单的，在google上搜索一下就可以马上得到答案了。不需要又要发帖问，又要等别人的回复。。。这么麻烦呢。快速回复	zhangrong 25-11-2008	72390	小名 26-11-2008 12:55
[性能评测] 神舟的如何？请用过的发言？最后发表： cnlancer 回复内容：原帖由 andyliubob 于 10-11-2008 01:04 发表登录/注册后可看大图 ls的我很赞同。支持国货，神州很惊艳的快速回复	carl181818 7-11-2008	72699	cnlancer 10-11-2008 12:25
[性能评测] TARGET的XBOX360 最后发表：西澳海豚回复内容：应该还在保固内吧？趁保固未过期，赶紧送回维修，免费处理！ PS：还是内地厂家，对於三红情形不负责？快速回复	川北凉粉 24-7-2008	92921	西澳海豚 8-11-2008 03:32
[性能评测] Core i7正式揭开面纱性能完全测试最后发表： yuba 回复内容：测试平台用的是Intel X25-M 80GB固态硬盘快速回复	yuba 3-11-2008	33142	yuba 4-11-2008 18:51
[性能评测] 谁用过iinet ADSL2 nake DSL服务? 最后发表： jimmy_hmj 回复内容： it's good, but i did not use iiTalk 快速回复	laowantong 8-10-2008	23026	jimmy_hmj 12-10-2008 00:06
[性能评测] 问大家一个问题，533的内存槽可以查800的内存吗？最后发表： megamicro 回复内容：原帖由 kane321 于 20-9-2008 21:31 发表登录/注册后可看大图不知道前面的当然是怎么来的,533和800的插槽当然是一样的都可以插,但对于某些板子某些内存你插他不支持的800内存不是蓝屏就是起不来,如果能起来自然就降到他支持的最高的跑,如果混插的话就按低的跑 kane321同学说的对，我的电脑是惠普的，后来到相关网站查，主伴支持到667，还好没买快速回复	megamicro 20-8-2008	72960	megamicro 21-9-2008 20:14
[性能评测] 咨询 ubuntuhk或其他精通网站的朋友最后发表： akai 回复内容：问你问题的人也是傻子。 1。lvs 2. 后端server 如果用动态后面还要有 3. 后端数据库所以他说的瘫是 lvs瘫痪 or 后端server瘫痪 or后端数据库瘫痪？如果是3的话可能几个并发就把数据库搞瘫痪了如果sql写的很滥。我遇到过 10个并发把我们数据库搞瘫痪的。纯粹静态的境况下。曾经有用一台alteon 2424 做到60万的session 还没有到alteon cpu瓶颈的地步但带宽满了1G 后面是20台 IIS 静态页面. iis上显示的session每台2万多（apache 当时的j这方面地确比不上iis）. 对于http 并发是个很模糊的概念。我所说的session是指已经establish的connection. 当时的带宽已经是下行 1G了平线。并发到底多少呢只能用log分析了。可惜当时的log 分析我从来也不看。。。。但我想几万并发是肯定有的。快速回复	carl181818 13-8-2008	133217	akai 24-8-2008 21:52